How We Increased Our Net Worth by $8,750 This Year Without Earning More or Spending Less

Today we will outline the simple change we made to our financial plan that will increase our savings by $8,750 this year.  It requires no increase in earnings or decrease in spending.  The exact dollar amount for you could be less, or even more, depending on your marital status and tax rate.* 

One of the most simple yet most effective ways to increase your net worth is to max out savings in tax deferred retirement accounts.  This allows you to keep more of your money every year by paying less taxes.  All of this money can go to work for you by compounding for years.  This also allows you to pay a much lower tax rate, or even no tax at all, when the tax man does come calling on this money.  If you, like us, have used a financial advisor and followed mainstream personal finance advice, you may not fully understand this concept.  In fact you may never have even known of this powerful strategy.  We never considered it until reading other early retirement blogs, and it has cost us thousands of dollars each year just in increased taxes paid unnecessarily.




Today, we hope to clarify why this is such a powerful strategy to drastically increase your savings rate while reducing the need to take investment risk and to explain why most people don’t know much about it.  We’ll do this by answering the questions we wish we would have asked years ago, but simply didn’t know to ask.

(1)  How do you defer paying taxes on your income?  For wage earning workers, the primary options are work related retirement accounts or individual retirement accounts (IRA).  The work related plans offer several huge advantages.  They allow for higher amounts to be deferred in a year, and they are not restricted by income limits.  The common work sponsored options are 401(k) or 403(b) plans with a 2014 limit of $17,500/person ($35,000/couple) or Simple IRA with a $12,000 limit/person ($24,000/couple) that can be deferred.  The other option to defer income is an IRA with a 2014 limit of only $5,500/person ($11,000/couple) that can be deferred.  The ability to defer even this much smaller amount is dependent on whether or not you have access to a work sponsored account and on your income.

(2)  If we’re just deferring our taxes, won’t we just have to pay them later?  Yes and no.  The standard argument against maxing out tax deferred accounts that we have read and heard from our advisor is that you are not really keeping more money because you are only deferring the earnings on which you will eventually have to pay taxes anyway.  This is technically true.  You will eventually have to pay taxes on these earnings.  However, the rate at which your money is taxed can be drastically different, as low as 0%, depending on when and how it is realized.  This is where a basic understanding of the federal income tax code is vital.  For a married couple filing jointly in 2014, because of the standard deduction and each individual’s personal exemption, the first $20,300 of earned income is free of federal income tax unless you earn over $305,000 at which point the personal exemptions begin phasing out.  The next $18,150 is taxed at 10%.  Therefore if you live on around $40,000/year as we do, and you paid taxes only on the money that you needed to live, you would pay a rate of only about 5%.  Our example would look like this:

($20,300*0)+($18,150*.10) = $0+$1,815.00=$1,815 tax.

$1,815 tax/ $38,450 income = 4.72% federal income tax rate.

As your earnings increase, the top tax rate incrementally continues to increase to 15%, then 25% to a maximum rate of 39.6% federal income tax for the highest wage earners.  Essentially, the more you earn the more you are penalized by the tax code because your dollars are taxed at different rates depending on where they fall in these tax brackets.  When you defer taxes on your income, you effectively lower your income avoiding the taxes on the last (most heavily taxed) dollars.  The $35,000 that we were able to defer this year all falls into the 25% tax bracket, giving us the $8,750 figure seen in the title ($35,000 * .25 = $8,750).  Therefore, depending on the tax bracket where your top dollars fall and whether you are single or married, you may have a higher or lower figure.  Regardless of your exact amount the concept is the same.

(For a full 2014 tax schedule, standard deduction and personal exemption amounts for 2014, you can check this link to gain a better understanding of this concept and figure out how much you can reduce your own taxes.  It also includes a link which shows that some of these amounts will increase, as they do periodically, in 2015 to adjust for inflation.)

(3)  Who should consider this strategy of maximizing tax deferred accounts?  This strategy would work to some extent for anyone who has a savings rate that would allow you to max out your tax deferred accounts.  That is because, by definition, you would live below your means.  Therefore, you would simply be shifting money from the present, when it is highly taxed but not needed, to the future when it would be needed to live and would fall into the lower tax rates.  Using our example above, if you utilized only this strategy we would decrease the taxes paid on this money from 25% to less than 5%, a savings of over 20% in tax rate.  The people who would benefit the most from the strategy are those who live a relatively frugal lifestyle but have high earnings because the difference in tax rates would be even larger.

(4)  If this strategy is so simple and obvious, why doesn’t everyone know about it and do it?  To answer that question, you have to look at the duty and motives of those who provide financial information.  You also have to consider the spending patterns of the average American.

First let’s look at the IRS.  Their duty is to provide information on the tax laws as passed by congress so that you can pay your taxes.  They do this at  They have no duty to help you develop a plan to pay the least amount of taxes.  In fact, it would be in the government’s best interest to collect as much tax as possible.

Next let’s consider the mainstream media.  Their motive is to reach the largest possible audience so that they can maximize revenue through the sale of advertising.  Since the average American has a savings rate near 0, this strategy would be completely useless to them.  Therefore, you will read and see the same tired stories about how we should all try to save 10% of our incomes (even though it is very difficult to do so blah, blah, blah) to provide for a secure retirement, pandering to the masses while rarely providing any relevant information to people really trying to improve their financial situation.

Financial advisors should know about this strategy, but would they encourage it?  Let’s look back to the accounts available to most people outlined in question #1.  The most powerful tools for most workers are work related accounts.  Advisors would have a hard time charging fees on these accounts.  Most advisors are paid by either commissions on investments they sell or a percentage of assets under their management.  This aspect of the tax code creates a strong incentive for advisors to not tell you to implement this strategy because the first $35,000 you invest in a year would be difficult to get under their control and charge fees on.  Very few people invest anywhere near this amount in a year.  Therefore, it is highly unlikely an advisor, paid in standard ways, would advise you use a tax deferral strategy that eliminates their source of income.  Ours didn’t!

(5)  Is there anything else we can do to decrease our taxes and keep more of our money?  Actually,this post is just the tip of the iceberg.  Our example is extremely over simplified focusing only on federal income tax rates to attempt to be as clear as possible about the massive impact of this strategy without muddying the waters.  We are completely ignoring the impact of having a child or any other deductions.  We are talking only about the deferral options available to most wage earning workers.  Business owners and certain other workers would be able to defer even higher amounts annually.  There are also other accounts such as health savings accounts (HSA’s) that can be used for the same benefits.  We are not trying to present our overall tax plan in this one post.  There are several other strategies we are employing to have an even greater effect, essentially eliminating taxes on this deferred money.

We want to present this information in bite size pieces to not make it overwhelming to any average reader with limited understanding of tax planning.  If you are still hungry for more information on this topic and can’t wait for future posts, I would refer you to the Mad Fientist blog and recommend starting with this post.  We have found him to be masterful in explaining these concepts.  Here are two other blogs I have been reading to learn more about tax planning:  I love this post from GoCurryCracker, and this is another excellent post from the blog Root of Good.  They both present some very interesting case studies in ways to drastically increase your wealth through applying these (and more advanced) tax strategies.  Check them out and share any comments, questions or ideas you may have below.

*This post is not meant to serve as a recommendation to choose any particular investment or investment strategy.  Nor is it meant to serve as tax advice.  We are simply sharing our opinions, experiences and strategies that we employ with our own finances.  We recommend strongly that you do your own independent research and develop a plan specific and appropriate to your own needs.  We encourage everyone to always question everything, including what you read on this blog.

*Image courtesy of Prakairoj at

*Thanks for reading. If you enjoyed this content, you can find my current writing at Can I Retire Yet?. Enter your email below to join our mailing list and be alerted when new content is published.

New Reader? Get free regular updates from Can I Retire Yet? on saving, investing, retiring, and retirement income. New articles about 2-4 times/month. Join more than 17,000 subscribers. Unsubscribe at any time:

11 comments on How We Increased Our Net Worth by $8,750 This Year Without Earning More or Spending Less

  1. Thanks for sharing my story on paying $150 in tax on a $150,000 income. It’s such a simple strategy to avoid paying thousands in taxes to turbocharge your financial growth. Glad you are highlighting that for the readers!

    1. Thank you for sharing your strategies! When I first started reading early retirement blogs like yours and the others highlighted above, I honestly thought that these strategies sounded too good to be true. We sat down and discussed them with a CPA friend who confirmed that they are all absolutely correct and absolutely legal. What a difference they make in accelerating wealth building.

  2. I’ve often wondered at the scant recognition of the enormous tax arbitrage offered by retirement accounts apart from their investment aspect. Perhaps from silly articles claiming Roth and regular accounts are “mathematically equivalent” tax wise, which would only be true in a flat tax regime. Certainly not in a progressive regime. Even at equivalent pre and post retirement income, contributions enter at top rates but come out at lower effective rates (ignoring any Social Security tax torpedo). Pretax accounts are a marvelous long term income averaging opportunity.

    1. Agree with you almost totally Steve. The one downside I see to this strategy for someone NOT looking to retire early is that work sponsored accounts are by far the best way to sock away this tax deferred money. Unfortunately, they are also often loaded with fees. Consider that when choosing your own investments with say Vanguard, you can do it for .1% or less. If you accumulate $500,000 this would cost only $500/year in fees. However, it is tough to get under 1% all in on many retirement accounts. By the time you accumulate $500,000 which is not that long for someone maxing out yearly, getting a company match, and getting decent growth, you would be paying $5,000 annually. Thus you would pay $4,500 additional in fees to save $4,500 annually in taxes for someone maxing out at $18,0000 at a marginal tax rate of 25%. The effect of higher fees of many 401(k) plans versus what you can do by DIY investing are massive.

      I think it is important to understand these nuances and know your personal situation. However, for an early retiree who will use the accounts for the minimal amount of time necessary and then role over to low cost alternatives after leaving a job, you are absolutely correct that this strategy is a massive tax arbitrage opportunity.

      1. Luckily, most plans I used had decent investments at low fees. Then after leaving rolled into Vanguard IRA.

        1. I’m in same boat and will do the same, but most plans I’ve looked at for friends and the plans we’ve been in before fees pretty terrible.

  3. I haven’t read through much of your blog but was directed here while reading JLC’s blog. After reading this post about maximizing IRA’s/work retirement plans…while I agree about the use of these plans, I would almost always say that maximizing a ROTH first is the smartest way to go. Imagine putting in $11,000 per year as a couple ($5500/person) and letting that ride for 30+ years before touching it and then NEVER paying any tax on any of it. The amount of income tax you paid on that $11,00 is a drop in the bucket compared to your tax savings at withdrawal. Of course that’s assuming you’re within the income limits (up to $133,000/single and up to $196,000/married before fully phased out).

    1. Thanks for the comment Aileen. I would disagree strongly with it however in theory. In practice, I do both anyway b/c we max both 401(k) which keeps income low enough to be able to then max 2 Roths.

      Tax planning can be difficult b/c it involves making projections with many moving parts. Will your spending/income be greater now or in the future, will tax rates be higher or lower in the future when recognizing income, etc? People who retire early are an exception in that it is almost always better to defer and save on the taxes in high earning years and then pay them at much lower rates when income and spending needs are less in the future. Here is another post I have written that expands on this topic:
      You can also check the archives at and as they have written extensively on the topic. Hope that helps clarify.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: